CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THIS IMAGE & COLOR IT IN!When it comes to cybersecurity tabletop exercises, engagement is the true victory condition. If cyber risk feels abstract or distant, even the most elegantly crafted tabletop can stumble before the dice are ever cast. Disengagement causes participants to retreat into the veil of silence, and almost inevitably, someone parries the scenario’s premise with a familiar riposte: “That would never happen here.”
This resistance isn’t apathy. It’s discomfort. Tabletop exercises lay bare the weak points in an org’s cybersecurity shield, often in front of peers and superiors. That vulnerability can breed defensiveness.
Cue the hero of our story: expert threat briefings. These can set the tone of the room before a cybersecurity exercise begins. By drawing from real-world lore and live threat activity, these briefings strip away conjecture, align the room on what is truly plausible, and root the exercise in the hard stone of reality rather than the shifting sands of assumption.
The result is an engaged party of players who buy in from the start, meaning Facilitators aren’t fighting an uphill battle for engagement while delivering the TTX. Let’s explore how expert threat briefings can empower the Facilitator to drive a more meaningful, high-impact tabletop exercise.
A threat briefing is a concise, tailored intelligence snapshot designed to prepare TTX participants for the journey ahead by grounding them in the threats that actually stalk their industry, their peers, and their crown jewels. It is the opening lore for the campaign, distilling cyber threat intelligence (CTI) that is most relevant to the organization. Keep it brief (10-15 minutes), then roll directly into the tabletop while the momentum is high.
Together, these three elements fuse to form a practical threat briefing framework. For supplemental lore on crafting effective threat intelligence briefings, this scroll from Feedly offers additional wisdom.
How do threat briefings improve tabletop exercises? They establish shared context. A strong briefing aligns the room on why this exercise matters now, what kinds of incidents are genuinely plausible, and which threats are already shaping the battlefield beyond the walls.
When participants recognize the scenario as something that has already unfolded in a neighboring kingdom, skepticism loosens its grip. The conversation shifts from “this would never happen here” to “it hasn’t happened here yet.” Early exposure to tales of real-world attacks leverages the anchoring effect, grounding the scenario in realism and urgency.
With the adversaries named and real-world battles recounted, participants stop treating the tabletop like a rehearsal of process and start preparing for a dragon that could raze the kingdom. This encourages the party to challenge the assumptions of old.
Paladins question whether armor would actually turn a blade. Mages wonder if wards would hold under fire. Leaders begin asking the uncomfortable questions they would never raise in a purely theoretical exercise, like whether defenses would simply fail at first contact or where chains of command are likely to break down. While uncomfortable at first, addressing these vulnerabilities allows the party to consider legendary defensive upgrades.
The threat briefing is best spoken through the voice of someone the players already trust, are familiar with, or find credible. Someone like a SOC commander who stood watch when raiders attempted to burn company systems down. Or perhaps a trusted external expert, such as a renowned government agent or battle-tested vendor.
Think of the person delivering the threat briefing as your own party member. You’re utilizing their skills or reputations to pass a persuasion check with the TTX participants. Through them, buy-in is won without debate, and scenario plausibility no longer needs defending.
This approach positions the Facilitator as a neutral guide at the war table, pointing back to shared truths presented by the individual who delivered the threat briefing, rather than personal assertion. The room stops questioning whether the threat is real and begins reckoning with how defenses will hold when the threat arrives.
In addition to establishing the lore of the scenario, expert threat briefings serve as a measured on-ramp into the exercise itself. During the briefing, the party begins in a listening stance, absorbing the threat and orienting themselves to the skirmish ahead. When the briefing ends and the tabletop begins, the party is called to action, shifting from observers to decision-makers. The person who delivers the briefing should allow for 1-2 clarifying questions to polish the transition, giving participants a chance to find their voices before the real choices and consequences come into play.
With the threat briefing complete, the party knows who’s eyeing crown jewels from beyond the fog of war, and how these rogues plan to get them. Let’s examine how Facilitators can make use of this knowledge in the battle ahead.
Threat briefings bestow on the Facilitator a priceless tool: a neutral mirror. By pointing back to real incidents from the briefing, the Facilitator can ask prickly questions without placing anyone on the defensive. “In the example we just saw, attackers abused OAuth tokens. How would we detect or stop that here?” When asked in this context, failure belongs to another organization, another kingdom, another unlucky party.
Participants are far more willing to critique another kingdom’s ruin before examining their own. From that safe footing, deeper truths about assumptions, response timelines, and bottlenecks begin to surface. The neutral mirror softens the blow delivered by these revelations, but the reflection is honest, and once seen, it cannot be ignored.
Let’s now explore how to bring threat briefings into your exercises immediately, how to choose the right herald to deliver the briefing, and how to shape the briefing so it enhances the exercise rather than overshadowing it. Think of the following section as the armorer’s guide: practical steps to ensure the weapon is balanced, credible, and ready for a live TTX.
As we’ve established, the most effective threat briefings are delivered by voices conjured from the sphere of credibility. Internal SOC or CTI teams bring firsthand knowledge of the organization’s terrain and the adversaries already probing fortifications, naturally making them an obvious choice.
Alternatively, external experts can carry equal weight, particularly when they come from law enforcement or sector intelligence groups, or are trusted advisors who have seen the same patterns sweep across many kingdoms. Groups like DHS Cybersecurity Advisors (CSA) or sector information sharing and analysis centers (ISACs) boost credibility and may even increase attendance, given their fame.
Many organizations already have access to these voices and simply need the Facilitator to help bring them in. Even trusted vendors can play this role, lending authority, fresh perspective, and sometimes a little extra draw like free swag that gets people eager to grab a seat at the table.
As we’ve established, the Facilitator should not be the one to deliver the threat briefing. Instead, the threat must be spoken by an authoritative source the organization already trusts, internal or external, whose credibility already exists beyond the tabletop.
This separation preserves the Facilitator’s neutrality and strengthens the threat briefer’s legitimacy. When questions of plausibility arise, the Facilitator need not argue. They simply point back to the briefing and say, “We aren’t making this up. This is a real threat others are already facing.”
A threat briefing is a carefully chosen spell, and like all magic, it must be cast with the recipient in mind to achieve the greatest effect. To this tune, it’s important to know who sits at the table and what will affect them most. Executives listen for impact and consequence, while technical leaders track mechanisms and feasibility. Aim the briefing accordingly.
If vendors are invited into the circle, draw the boundary clearly. This is not a market stall. No pitches, no posturing, only signal strong enough to guide the quest ahead.
Expert threat briefings are not extra content layered onto an exercise. They are the ground beneath it. By anchoring participants in real threats, real adversaries, and real consequences, these briefings ensure that everyone at the table shares the same map before the journey begins. Perhaps more importantly, threat briefings lower shields. When the threat is externalized and proven, defensiveness fades, and honest conversation takes its place.
The craft need not be complex. A simple, repeatable format is enough. 10-15 minutes focused on relevant industry threats, paired with real-world incident examples and space for 1-2 clarifying questions, can transform the exercise that follows. By fusing expert threat briefings into your tabletop exercise planning process, you set the stakes before the dice fall.
An expert threat briefing is a short, pre-exercise intelligence overview that grounds tabletop participants in real-world threats, adversaries, and incidents relevant to their organization.
Participants disengage when scenarios feel implausible or abstract, and expert threat briefings restore engagement by proving the threat is real, current, and already affecting similar organizations.
Expert threat briefings should be delivered immediately before the tabletop as a 10-15 minute on-ramp that establishes shared context and anchors the scenario in real-world precedent.
Threat briefings should be delivered by a trusted internal or external expert (such as SOC leaders, intelligence teams, or government partners, rather than the Facilitator) to preserve neutrality and credibility.
Ally exists to help Facilitators run exercises that earn trust, drive engagement, and surface what truly needs to be addressed. If you’re ready to bring this level of clarity and engagement to your TTXs, then your next quest is simple. Book a demo, and let’s chat about how we can empower your next campaign.
About Ally Security
Ally is here to support facilitators, which in turn creates a virtuous cycle where exercises take less time, provide more value, are run more frequently, and can make every organization can be better prepared.
The unexpected wins. The client curveballs. The chaos you couldn’t have scripted if you tried. Dear Asa is your space to share the stories that don’t make it into the official post-incident report. Script, submit, and enjoy a chance to be featured or quoted in an upcoming post.
